Author Archives: brandonio21

Summer of 2012 Book Quotes

This post was moved from the now no-longer-existent Brandonsoft developers blog and was originally written on August 11, 2012.

Over the summer, I have been busy reading various books. Of course, with all books, there are very memorable quotes within these books. Often times, I would post these quotes to Facebook and watch as hilarity ensues as my friends argue about the topic. Here are some of the quotes that I found particularly interesting:

What you alter in remembering has yet a reality, known or not.

-The Road by Cormac McCarthy

 

There is no God and we are his prophets.

-The Road by Cormac McCarthy

 

Only in the best of possible worlds is all for the best.

-Candide by Voltaire

 

These quotes are not only memorable because they address topics that are highly controversial, but they also do so very elegantly, giving them a profound sense of enlightenment. Plus, all three quotes contain very powerful messages.

Review: Amnesia – The Dark Descent

This post was moved from the now no-longer-existent Brandonsoft developers blog and was originally written on April 6, 2012.

 

 

When I was first introduced to videogames when I was around 4 or 5, I was taught that there is only one way to play videogames, and that is to win. So ever since then, I have played videogames in order to win. Any single player game I would buzz through the main storyline and put the game down once I completed it. Any multiplayer game I would compete to be the very best, and that was all. It never really occurred to me that there was more to the world of videogames, especially single player games. Amnesia taught me different.

My friends told me to purchase Amnesia because they said it was the scariest game they had ever played. I never really thought that a videogame could be scary, so when the game finally went on sale on Steam, I picked it up, and I wasn’t dissapointed.

When I first started up the game, I was greeted with a message that said something along the lines of turn off the lights, wear headphones, focus, and don’t worry about winning or dying, saving will be taken care of. Needless to say, I was intimidated. However, I wanted to try this game out for what it was worth, so I followed the instructions.

A fountain in Amnesia: The Dark Descent

Amnesia has a very unique, scary, architectural style.


For those of you who don’t know, Amnesia is a first person horror adventure game for the PC, where your character, Daniel, drinks an Amnesia potion and relives his memories in order to accomplish an overall goal. The main premise behind the game is that you are a normal person, who cannot fight back against any sort of monster that you may encounter, you may only run and hide.

Well, after about 20 minutes of playing the game with my lights off, headphones on, and full focus on my computer, I was immersed. I felt myself inside the game. I would lose track of time, pick up random objects and examine them, be interested in parts of the game that were not part of my current objective, and I was loving it. This was the first time this had happened to me, I felt like I was in another world while playing this videogame. Were all videogames like this? That discussion is for later. As for Amnesia, the game was very good. The story was very intriguing, the graphics were great, the sound was phenomenal, the overall design of the game is great, and the horror.. oh my.

Since you are not allowed to attack the monsters you encounter during the game, you become very weary about encountering them. And this makes you fearful. Not only is this game the type of horror that makes you jump out of your seat because something loud and unexpected happens, but it is the game that makes you scared to turn the next corner. Often times while playing, if I heard a noise I often times stepped backward out of fear. I wasn’t scared that I was going to die and possibly lose some progress, but instead I was scared that I would see something. The game makes you feel like you are there. The puzzles it contains are very interactive, and make you feel even more attached to the game. Overall, it is a completely immersive experience that I have never actually experienced before. This game was definitely worth every penny.

With that being said, since I enjoyed the immersiveness of Amnesia: The Dark Descent so much, I decided to play some other games in the same fashion, and it has made games much more enjoyable. For example, in The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, instead of focusing only on the main questline, I often times went off to explore, and this exploration led to new caves, which led to new people, which led to new quests, which led to a whole new world of fun! I am about 45 hours into the game and have not yet completed the second part of the main questline, and I am loving the game. I had the same experience with Mass Effect 2. I think this is the way games are supposed to be played, and I never knew about it before. Amnesia: The Dark Descent not only gave me a great 10 hour long horrifying adventure, but it also taught me how to enjoy videogames to a whole new level.

Review: The Shallows – What The Internet Is Doing To Our Brains by Nicholas Carr

This post was migrated from the no-longer-existent Brandonsoft developer blog and was originally written on May 22, 2012.

It is not often that I post reviews of things that I enjoyed, or didn’t enjoy. It is also seldom that I post reviews about books, novels, or fictional tales, all of which may be collapsed into the former category. Reading has been an enjoyable pastime to me as of late, and I have learned many things from it. One of which being how to write in an eloquent yet simple fashion. The crafting of words has always appealed to me in a way that Legos appear to a young child, and with that being said, I shall begin my review.

The Shallows: What The Internet Is Doing To Our Brains is a novel packed with information about how the human brain works, and what our modern information-based society changes about our every day lives. Nicholas Carr writes about this in a very personalized style, making the book both easy and fun to read. I have to admit, I was a little worried when I picked up this book due to the fact that I have no knowledge of advanced neuroscience whatsoever, and I thought that my lack of knowledge would make Carr’s arguments incomprehensible. However, that clearly was not the case. Nicholas Carr explains everything from basic ideas to advanced theories using brilliant everyday examples, allowing the reader to truly get a sense of what he is talking about. I felt like I was following Carr’s logic every step of the way.

There are also carefully placed personal digressions, where Carr takes the reader away from the argument or history lesson at hand and explains his own personal thoughts on the topic. I have to praise Carr for this, because admittedly, the personal examples he uses in the digressions would have done his central argument no good if they were placed within the text itself, but they add the perfect amount of spice when given their own personal sections. Not only do they allow the reader a break from the argument, but they allow the reader to know Carr, to feel his feelings, to take a quick walk in his shoes. This, I felt, strongly attached me to the author and helped push his argument along.

As far as the content of the book goes, I was a little dismayed by how off topic some chapters seemed to be. For instance, there is a section in the book in which the reader is led down a windy path concerned with the arguments and counter-arguments about the effects of search engines on the brain, when suddenly, the reader reaches a quick and sudden end to the path. This end: a history lesson on how Larry Page revolutionized the Internet world by creating Google. In my opinion, this was extremely out of place. There are several other examples of this style of seemingly unintended paths throughout the book.

Despite this, Carr’s central argument is convincing, and I felt myself agreeing with him and his thoughts on topics with almost everything he said. This may be due to the fact that we are both on the computer a lot, but it may also be contributed to the fact that Carr simply knows how to write and make a point. Whatever the reason, it simply works. The counter-arguments and Carr’s concessions almost seem invisible throughout the work, however, and this weakens his argument. Although there was a discussion of how Aristotle did not believe in using pen and paper, Carr did not seem to address the arguments of those believing that constant computer use does not change our way of thought. This may be because those arguments are either weak or nonexistent, but they should have been addressed nonetheless.

Overall, Nicholas Carr’s work was both enjoyable to read and intriguing. Although it makes me think twice about getting onto the computer each day, I do not regret reading it. If you are an everyday computer user like myself, I suggest picking up this book.

 

Nicholas Carr’s The Shallows: http://www.theshallowsbook.com/nicholascarr/Nicholas_Carrs_The_Shallows.html

Nicholas Carr’s The Shallows on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/The-Shallows-Internet-Doing-Brains/dp/0393072223

Writing Papers is Easy

In middle school, high school, and even college, the word “paper” carries a
heavy negative connotation. It is not a rare event for a student to sigh, frown,
and mutter “I have to write a paper”. For whatever reason, papers are agreed to
be feared by the majority of people; however, they have no reason to be feared.
Writing papers is a simple and formulaic process that can easily be taught to
anyone, as I will attempt to do here.

The main reason for writing this post is because of my brother, who came to me
seeking help on a paper that was due in a few days. Although he was assigned
the paper weeks ago, he put it off because he was scared to write it. With my
help, he was able to complete an A paper in just a few days and impress his
peers. On top of this, he is now confident writing any sort of paper.

Please keep in mind that this article is geared toward writing research-style
papers, where an argument is being made. Although some of these tips may apply
to other styles of writing, this article is not meant to be strictly adhered
to when writing things such as creative papers.

So What’s the Secret?

In general, there are several pieces of advice you should follow when writing a
paper. You’ve probably heard a few of these words of wisdom in your life, but
they should be taken seriously.
* Start Early. Although it is tempting to continuously put off a paper,
starting early allows you to do only a small amount of work each day and allows
for time at the end to revise and make sure that everything is perfect.
* Write Often. This goes with the previous piece of advice, where starting
early is fairly useless unless you also write fairly often. It is very useful
to stick to a strict schedule and not waver from it. If a strict schedule is
followed, daily writing time can be minimized to something like an hour a day,
which is not bad at all.
* Stay Calm. One of the worst mistakes that people make while writing papers
is getting overwhelmed. They will think of the fifteen pages that have to write
and constantly just try to meet the page limit without thinking about the
quality of their work. Stay calm, stay collected, and consistently complete
small amounts of high quality work.
* Self-Discipline is Important. All of the above rules are great; however,
they do not have any effects on their own. Without self-discipline, it is easy
to waver from any rules you may set and “do it some other time”. Discipline
yourself seriously by taking away things you love. Be your own parent.

The General Formula

With the above tips in mind, it is fairly easy to begin writing and complete
your paper in a reasonable amount of time. Careful attention to planning,
detail, and quality also help create an excellent paper. However, no paper
can be written without an explicit statement of the requirements of that paper.
For most research papers, the general requirements follow a pattern of making
a claim, backing up that claim with a source, and proving that source is
reputable. It’s that simple. Of course, this process needs to be repeated many
times in a succesful paper; however, the process itself is still very easy.

Making a Claim

A claim is simply something that you believe to be true. For instance, “Green
makes humans feel relaxed.” is a claim. Other examples of claims are “Violent
video games cause violent behavior”, “Using a mouse boosts productivity” and
“Wearing hats boosts self-confidence”. Basically, a claim is a statement that
is debatable and must be proven. Thus, the main argument of your paper is also
a claim. Making a claim is quite simple, really. All you have to do is state
what you think to be correct. The hard part comes next.

Proving your Claim

A claim is great on its own because it may cause the reader to question the
thing you’re making a claim about. This questioning may cause them to make a
new conclusion about the topic and thus lead to an advancement in knowledge.
However, this doesn’t really advance your paper. Thus, you need to prove your
claim. Generally, in order to prove your claim, you need to provide evidence
that suggests that your claim may be true. Using the examples of claims from
the above section, here is what some evidence may look like:

  • Violent video games cause violent behavior. A study of 20 children showed that
    those who played violent video games were more aggressive as adults.
  • Using a mouse boosts productivity. People who use a mouse report 5 times more
    productivity than their keyboard-weilding counterparts.
  • Wearing hats boosts self-confidence. Several brain imaging scans show that
    the frontal lobe is more active while wearing a hat.

With the evidence provided, you can see that our claims are now strengthened.
The claim strengthened with the evidence makes up our argument. How do we know
that this evidence is actually correct, though? That leads to the final step in
our paper-recipe-for-success.

Bolstering the Evidence

The details of evidence can either make or break the evidence. For instance,
saying that “because my grandma said it and my grandma is always right” is much
less powerful than saying “journal X reported it and journal X peer-reviews
all submitted articles”. In order to help the reader believe that the evidence
you provided is legitimate and correct, you need to explicitly tell them. In a
nutshell, the reader needs to know why the evidence you chose is the best and
most relevant evidence and why it isn’t incorrect. Using our previous examples
to prove our point:

  • A study of 20 children showed that those who played violent video games were
    more aggressive as adults. The control group, who were not exposed to
    violent video games, were less aggressive. The lives of the subjects were
    heavily monitored.
  • People who use a mouse report 5 times more productivity than their
    keyboard-weilding counterparts, who reported only a small productivity boost
    when asked the same question about a keyboard. This question was performed by
    an unbiased team over thousands of subjects.
  • Several brain imaging scans show that the frontal lobe is more active while
    wearing a hat. These results were reported in Journal of Sciences, which is
    peer-reviewed and notorious for rejecting submissions with even a hint of
    malpractice.

As you can see, a lot of “evidence bolstering” involves showing that the
evidence was not simply construed, but rather it was compared with a control
group, meaning that the observed evidence was indeed significant. With the third
example, we don’t show details about the experiment (because we may not know),
but we show that the experiment was well-done and results were accurate because
the journal wouldn’t accept anything less. All of these are valid ways to show
that an example is more than just words, but a meaningful set of results.

And with that, the three simple steps of an argument come together and form
something meaningful and convincing. A research paper simply consists of these
steps repeated several times. However, they are repeated in a cascading matter.
That is, your big “main claim” is supported by several “subclaims”, which are
each supported by evidence that has some sort of backing behind it. This
cascading layout can create a pretty complex paper. As an outline, your paper
should look something like this:

A) Background information and significance
B) Main Claim (Also known as the Thesis statement)
C) Subclaim #1
–i) Evidence
—-a) Backing of Evidence
–ii) More Evidence
—-a) Backing of Evidence
D) Subclaim #2
–i) Evidence
—-a) Backing of Evidence
–ii) More Evidence
—-a) Backing of Evidence
E) Subclaim #3
–i) Evidence
—-a) Backing of Evidence
–ii) More Evidence
—-a) Backing of Evidence
F) Conclusion

Sometimes, of course, a subclaim may be so complicated that it warrants its own
subclaim, which may warrant another subclaim, and so on. However, in order to
create a convincing paper, the amount of subclaims should be kept to a minimal
amount. An example of this repeating subclaim hierarchy can be seen with our
last example, where a bit of the evidence also requires a subclaim. In totality,
our current claim is as follows:

” People who wear hats are more self-confident. This was proven to indeed be
the case in S&R’s experiment reported in Journal of Science, which showed
increased frontal lobe activity while wearing hats. ”

This claim is a little problematic. Why? You, like I, may be wondering what
“frontal lobe activity” has to do with self-confidence. It is here where another
subclaim may serve to be useful. In order to complete the argument, we can
make another subclaim showing that frontal lobe activity is indeed correlated
with self-confidence, which of course, will require another piece of evidence.
Thus, our argument could be:

” People who wear hats are more self-confident. This was proven to indeed be
the case in S&R’s experiment reported in Journal of Science, which showed
increased frontal lobe activity while wearing hats. This frontal lobe activity
is commonly correlated with increases in self-confidence, as shown in Kirk’s
study of students, which showed that those who categorized themselves as having
a large amount of “self-confidence” had larger frontal lobe regions. This
study was posted in a peer-reviewed journal and is the basis of most modern
self-confidence studies. Therefore, if you’re ever feeling a little lacking in
the confidence area, donning a hat may help. ”

When all elements are combined, a fantastic and convincing argument will create
itself.

The Steps to Completing The Paper

Now that you’re aware of how to write a convincing argument, you may be
wondering how in the world you will have time to come up with claims, address
necessary subclaims, and find reputable evidence for each claim. The process
is surprisingly not very time-consuming as long as you follow the general
time-management guidelines suggested above.

Make an Outline

The first step to any long-term project involves getting your thoughts and
ideas out in an organized fashion. For a paper, the perfect way of doing this
is through an outline. In your first outline, you may want to include the
following items:
1) Your full introduction less your thesis statement
2) Your thesis statement (Or a rough version of it)
3) Subclaim #1
–3i) Evidence supporting subclaim #1 and proof that it is reputable
–3ii) Evidence supporting subclaim #1 and proof that it is reputable
4) Subclaim #2
–4i) Evidence supporting subclaim #2 and proof that it is reputable
–4ii) Evidence supporting subclaim #2 and proof that it is reputable
5) Subclaim #3
–5i) Evidence supporting subclaim #3 and proof that it is reputable
–5ii) Evidence supporting subclaim #3 and proof that it is reputable
6) Conclusion Paragraph

Then, over the next few days, instead of working on the details of the paper
itself, iterate over the outline, find better evidence and sources to back up
your claims, refine your thesis statement and your subclaims. Then, when writing
the actual paper, the only hard work will be choosing words that sound nice.
Each number in the outline represents a new paragraph. Thus, the outline
very closely resembles what your final paper looks like. I’m not going to tell
you the exact process of turning the outline into a paper, but it definitely
isn’t hard.

The Source List

Now, your paper should be pretty close to being complete. The final step is to
simply include your “bibliography” or “reference list”. This is the easiest
step of the entire paper, but most people have a hard time with it. Most papers
will have a format requirement, whether it be MLA or APA or Chicago-Style. Thus,
since you have already compiled your list of evidence when creating your
outline, making a source list is easy. Simply look up the guidelines for your
required formatting style and put in the list of evidence that you used
in your outline. That’s it.

Formatting is Easy

Speaking of formatting requirements, many people who are writing papers for
school lose easy points because they mess up while formatting their papers.
Admittedly, it is easy to be intimidated while getting caught up in the minute
details of MLA or APA or Chicago; however, most of these formatting styles have
online checklists that are easy to follow. Generally, each format has their
own unique style for the following items:

  • Margins
  • Headers including title pages
  • Fonts
  • In-Text citations
  • Source Lists

Once you edit each of these components of your essay to reflect the style
guidelines set by your formatting requirement, it will look great, giving off
a better first impression and hopefully a higher grade.

Additional Techniques

There are also some additional techniques that will give your paper extra
oomph and extra convincing power. Most of these techniques involve a sort-of
interaction with the reader. If you can predict what the reader is thinking,
you become liked by the reader and they are more prone to listen to what you
have to say in your paper.

Addressing Counter-Arguments

Have you ever watched a commercial or talked to someone who said “But wait..
I know what you’re thinking!” and then they proceed to disprove your opinion?
It’s a very powerful tool. The listener becomes impressed at the fact that
the speaker knew what they were thinking, and the listener is even more
prone to further convincing.

Basically, any time that your argument may seem to have a flaw in it, explicitly
address this seeming flaw and disprove it. Take, for instance, our hat argument,
which is seemingly riddled with flaws. Addressing the possible counter-arguments
makes our argument even stronger.

” It has been proven that people who wear hats have higher levels of
self-confidence. In order to avoid a scenario where only people with naturally
high self-confidence levels were measured, self-confidence levels were measured
before and after the donning of the cap, which always resulted in increased
self-confidence levels. ”

This particular snippet addresses the possible counter-argument of “But what if
the people measured are simply self-confident by themselves?”. For any reader
that was thinking that, addressing their thoughts makes your argument powerful
to them. This addressing of counter-argument can be done with almost any claim
you make, and when used at the right moments will only help convince your
audience that you are right.

Show your Personality

Everyone has that one friend that tells them something along the lines of “Just
use big words from the thesaurus and it will make you sound smart”. In general,
the belief is that if you use big words, you will sound smarter and receive
a higher grade on your paper. Although this course of action may actually result
in higher grades, it does not result in a higher quality paper. In order to
create the highest quality paper, you should let your personality shine through
with every word you choose. If your paper has your sense of humor, your
cheerful choice of words, and your own personal vocabulary, your paper is more
likely to come off as natural to the reader. If your paper is more natural
and more human, it will also be more believable. Of course, never use so much
of your personality that your paper comes off as unprofessional.

In Short

In short, it’s really not too challenging to write a good paper. The main
barriers that stop people from writing good papers are in the minds of the
writers. Most people simply don’t want to follow a strict paper-writing
schedule, while others get too overwhelmed by the idea of following a
strict-schedule and instead ruin their chances of writing a good paper by
committing to a schedule that does not promote solid research and solid
revisioning. As long as you stick to a strict schedule with self-discipline,
make a good outline, make good claims with good evidence, and give yourself
plenty of time for revisions, writing a paper should be a breeze.