Category Archives: Academia-Like

Things that are academia-like, even though I’m not formally involved with academia

Why I am Ditching

Over the past years, I have written several papers that I am proud of. I wanted to put all of these papers in a place where people would be able to find them and learn about the arguments I was making. I found, which seemed to be exactly what I was looking for.

Since posting my papers to Academia, their views have skyrocketed. I have also been contacted by several people thanking me for my work. The interactions between papers, data, and readers that Academia provide are extremely interesting.

However, it seems that Academia has recently changed its mindset. When I first started using them, their landing page was a place to search for papers and see the most popular pieces of research. Recently, their landing page changed to something else: A simple prompt to register for an account.'s new landing page, emphasizing account-creation over paper-finding’s new landing page, emphasizing account-creation over knowledge-finding

The new landing page sends a clear message:’s goals have changed. Instead of wanting their users to find free research in the quickest way possible, they want their users to make an account. They do not want to spread free knowledge, they want to increase the number of people who are registered on their website.

Further, now requires an account to download papers.

These are not values that I would like my papers to be associated with. Although Academia’s high search engine rankings are beneficial to the popularity of my papers, sacrifices must be made to ensure that my papers are free to access (Both in the sense of cost and in the sense of accessibility). Blocking curious minds behind an account creation process is not free.

In the coming days, I will be moving all of my papers to a specific “Papers” page of this website. Unless Academia changes its ways, I will no longer be using them to host my research.

Writing Papers is Easy

In middle school, high school, and even college, the word “paper” carries a
heavy negative connotation. It is not a rare event for a student to sigh, frown,
and mutter “I have to write a paper”. For whatever reason, papers are agreed to
be feared by the majority of people; however, they have no reason to be feared.
Writing papers is a simple and formulaic process that can easily be taught to
anyone, as I will attempt to do here.

The main reason for writing this post is because of my brother, who came to me
seeking help on a paper that was due in a few days. Although he was assigned
the paper weeks ago, he put it off because he was scared to write it. With my
help, he was able to complete an A paper in just a few days and impress his
peers. On top of this, he is now confident writing any sort of paper.

Please keep in mind that this article is geared toward writing research-style
papers, where an argument is being made. Although some of these tips may apply
to other styles of writing, this article is not meant to be strictly adhered
to when writing things such as creative papers.

So What’s the Secret?

In general, there are several pieces of advice you should follow when writing a
paper. You’ve probably heard a few of these words of wisdom in your life, but
they should be taken seriously.
* Start Early. Although it is tempting to continuously put off a paper,
starting early allows you to do only a small amount of work each day and allows
for time at the end to revise and make sure that everything is perfect.
* Write Often. This goes with the previous piece of advice, where starting
early is fairly useless unless you also write fairly often. It is very useful
to stick to a strict schedule and not waver from it. If a strict schedule is
followed, daily writing time can be minimized to something like an hour a day,
which is not bad at all.
* Stay Calm. One of the worst mistakes that people make while writing papers
is getting overwhelmed. They will think of the fifteen pages that have to write
and constantly just try to meet the page limit without thinking about the
quality of their work. Stay calm, stay collected, and consistently complete
small amounts of high quality work.
* Self-Discipline is Important. All of the above rules are great; however,
they do not have any effects on their own. Without self-discipline, it is easy
to waver from any rules you may set and “do it some other time”. Discipline
yourself seriously by taking away things you love. Be your own parent.

The General Formula

With the above tips in mind, it is fairly easy to begin writing and complete
your paper in a reasonable amount of time. Careful attention to planning,
detail, and quality also help create an excellent paper. However, no paper
can be written without an explicit statement of the requirements of that paper.
For most research papers, the general requirements follow a pattern of making
a claim, backing up that claim with a source, and proving that source is
reputable. It’s that simple. Of course, this process needs to be repeated many
times in a succesful paper; however, the process itself is still very easy.

Making a Claim

A claim is simply something that you believe to be true. For instance, “Green
makes humans feel relaxed.” is a claim. Other examples of claims are “Violent
video games cause violent behavior”, “Using a mouse boosts productivity” and
“Wearing hats boosts self-confidence”. Basically, a claim is a statement that
is debatable and must be proven. Thus, the main argument of your paper is also
a claim. Making a claim is quite simple, really. All you have to do is state
what you think to be correct. The hard part comes next.

Proving your Claim

A claim is great on its own because it may cause the reader to question the
thing you’re making a claim about. This questioning may cause them to make a
new conclusion about the topic and thus lead to an advancement in knowledge.
However, this doesn’t really advance your paper. Thus, you need to prove your
claim. Generally, in order to prove your claim, you need to provide evidence
that suggests that your claim may be true. Using the examples of claims from
the above section, here is what some evidence may look like:

  • Violent video games cause violent behavior. A study of 20 children showed that
    those who played violent video games were more aggressive as adults.
  • Using a mouse boosts productivity. People who use a mouse report 5 times more
    productivity than their keyboard-weilding counterparts.
  • Wearing hats boosts self-confidence. Several brain imaging scans show that
    the frontal lobe is more active while wearing a hat.

With the evidence provided, you can see that our claims are now strengthened.
The claim strengthened with the evidence makes up our argument. How do we know
that this evidence is actually correct, though? That leads to the final step in
our paper-recipe-for-success.

Bolstering the Evidence

The details of evidence can either make or break the evidence. For instance,
saying that “because my grandma said it and my grandma is always right” is much
less powerful than saying “journal X reported it and journal X peer-reviews
all submitted articles”. In order to help the reader believe that the evidence
you provided is legitimate and correct, you need to explicitly tell them. In a
nutshell, the reader needs to know why the evidence you chose is the best and
most relevant evidence and why it isn’t incorrect. Using our previous examples
to prove our point:

  • A study of 20 children showed that those who played violent video games were
    more aggressive as adults. The control group, who were not exposed to
    violent video games, were less aggressive. The lives of the subjects were
    heavily monitored.
  • People who use a mouse report 5 times more productivity than their
    keyboard-weilding counterparts, who reported only a small productivity boost
    when asked the same question about a keyboard. This question was performed by
    an unbiased team over thousands of subjects.
  • Several brain imaging scans show that the frontal lobe is more active while
    wearing a hat. These results were reported in Journal of Sciences, which is
    peer-reviewed and notorious for rejecting submissions with even a hint of

As you can see, a lot of “evidence bolstering” involves showing that the
evidence was not simply construed, but rather it was compared with a control
group, meaning that the observed evidence was indeed significant. With the third
example, we don’t show details about the experiment (because we may not know),
but we show that the experiment was well-done and results were accurate because
the journal wouldn’t accept anything less. All of these are valid ways to show
that an example is more than just words, but a meaningful set of results.

And with that, the three simple steps of an argument come together and form
something meaningful and convincing. A research paper simply consists of these
steps repeated several times. However, they are repeated in a cascading matter.
That is, your big “main claim” is supported by several “subclaims”, which are
each supported by evidence that has some sort of backing behind it. This
cascading layout can create a pretty complex paper. As an outline, your paper
should look something like this:

A) Background information and significance
B) Main Claim (Also known as the Thesis statement)
C) Subclaim #1
–i) Evidence
—-a) Backing of Evidence
–ii) More Evidence
—-a) Backing of Evidence
D) Subclaim #2
–i) Evidence
—-a) Backing of Evidence
–ii) More Evidence
—-a) Backing of Evidence
E) Subclaim #3
–i) Evidence
—-a) Backing of Evidence
–ii) More Evidence
—-a) Backing of Evidence
F) Conclusion

Sometimes, of course, a subclaim may be so complicated that it warrants its own
subclaim, which may warrant another subclaim, and so on. However, in order to
create a convincing paper, the amount of subclaims should be kept to a minimal
amount. An example of this repeating subclaim hierarchy can be seen with our
last example, where a bit of the evidence also requires a subclaim. In totality,
our current claim is as follows:

” People who wear hats are more self-confident. This was proven to indeed be
the case in S&R’s experiment reported in Journal of Science, which showed
increased frontal lobe activity while wearing hats. ”

This claim is a little problematic. Why? You, like I, may be wondering what
“frontal lobe activity” has to do with self-confidence. It is here where another
subclaim may serve to be useful. In order to complete the argument, we can
make another subclaim showing that frontal lobe activity is indeed correlated
with self-confidence, which of course, will require another piece of evidence.
Thus, our argument could be:

” People who wear hats are more self-confident. This was proven to indeed be
the case in S&R’s experiment reported in Journal of Science, which showed
increased frontal lobe activity while wearing hats. This frontal lobe activity
is commonly correlated with increases in self-confidence, as shown in Kirk’s
study of students, which showed that those who categorized themselves as having
a large amount of “self-confidence” had larger frontal lobe regions. This
study was posted in a peer-reviewed journal and is the basis of most modern
self-confidence studies. Therefore, if you’re ever feeling a little lacking in
the confidence area, donning a hat may help. ”

When all elements are combined, a fantastic and convincing argument will create

The Steps to Completing The Paper

Now that you’re aware of how to write a convincing argument, you may be
wondering how in the world you will have time to come up with claims, address
necessary subclaims, and find reputable evidence for each claim. The process
is surprisingly not very time-consuming as long as you follow the general
time-management guidelines suggested above.

Make an Outline

The first step to any long-term project involves getting your thoughts and
ideas out in an organized fashion. For a paper, the perfect way of doing this
is through an outline. In your first outline, you may want to include the
following items:
1) Your full introduction less your thesis statement
2) Your thesis statement (Or a rough version of it)
3) Subclaim #1
–3i) Evidence supporting subclaim #1 and proof that it is reputable
–3ii) Evidence supporting subclaim #1 and proof that it is reputable
4) Subclaim #2
–4i) Evidence supporting subclaim #2 and proof that it is reputable
–4ii) Evidence supporting subclaim #2 and proof that it is reputable
5) Subclaim #3
–5i) Evidence supporting subclaim #3 and proof that it is reputable
–5ii) Evidence supporting subclaim #3 and proof that it is reputable
6) Conclusion Paragraph

Then, over the next few days, instead of working on the details of the paper
itself, iterate over the outline, find better evidence and sources to back up
your claims, refine your thesis statement and your subclaims. Then, when writing
the actual paper, the only hard work will be choosing words that sound nice.
Each number in the outline represents a new paragraph. Thus, the outline
very closely resembles what your final paper looks like. I’m not going to tell
you the exact process of turning the outline into a paper, but it definitely
isn’t hard.

The Source List

Now, your paper should be pretty close to being complete. The final step is to
simply include your “bibliography” or “reference list”. This is the easiest
step of the entire paper, but most people have a hard time with it. Most papers
will have a format requirement, whether it be MLA or APA or Chicago-Style. Thus,
since you have already compiled your list of evidence when creating your
outline, making a source list is easy. Simply look up the guidelines for your
required formatting style and put in the list of evidence that you used
in your outline. That’s it.

Formatting is Easy

Speaking of formatting requirements, many people who are writing papers for
school lose easy points because they mess up while formatting their papers.
Admittedly, it is easy to be intimidated while getting caught up in the minute
details of MLA or APA or Chicago; however, most of these formatting styles have
online checklists that are easy to follow. Generally, each format has their
own unique style for the following items:

  • Margins
  • Headers including title pages
  • Fonts
  • In-Text citations
  • Source Lists

Once you edit each of these components of your essay to reflect the style
guidelines set by your formatting requirement, it will look great, giving off
a better first impression and hopefully a higher grade.

Additional Techniques

There are also some additional techniques that will give your paper extra
oomph and extra convincing power. Most of these techniques involve a sort-of
interaction with the reader. If you can predict what the reader is thinking,
you become liked by the reader and they are more prone to listen to what you
have to say in your paper.

Addressing Counter-Arguments

Have you ever watched a commercial or talked to someone who said “But wait..
I know what you’re thinking!” and then they proceed to disprove your opinion?
It’s a very powerful tool. The listener becomes impressed at the fact that
the speaker knew what they were thinking, and the listener is even more
prone to further convincing.

Basically, any time that your argument may seem to have a flaw in it, explicitly
address this seeming flaw and disprove it. Take, for instance, our hat argument,
which is seemingly riddled with flaws. Addressing the possible counter-arguments
makes our argument even stronger.

” It has been proven that people who wear hats have higher levels of
self-confidence. In order to avoid a scenario where only people with naturally
high self-confidence levels were measured, self-confidence levels were measured
before and after the donning of the cap, which always resulted in increased
self-confidence levels. ”

This particular snippet addresses the possible counter-argument of “But what if
the people measured are simply self-confident by themselves?”. For any reader
that was thinking that, addressing their thoughts makes your argument powerful
to them. This addressing of counter-argument can be done with almost any claim
you make, and when used at the right moments will only help convince your
audience that you are right.

Show your Personality

Everyone has that one friend that tells them something along the lines of “Just
use big words from the thesaurus and it will make you sound smart”. In general,
the belief is that if you use big words, you will sound smarter and receive
a higher grade on your paper. Although this course of action may actually result
in higher grades, it does not result in a higher quality paper. In order to
create the highest quality paper, you should let your personality shine through
with every word you choose. If your paper has your sense of humor, your
cheerful choice of words, and your own personal vocabulary, your paper is more
likely to come off as natural to the reader. If your paper is more natural
and more human, it will also be more believable. Of course, never use so much
of your personality that your paper comes off as unprofessional.

In Short

In short, it’s really not too challenging to write a good paper. The main
barriers that stop people from writing good papers are in the minds of the
writers. Most people simply don’t want to follow a strict paper-writing
schedule, while others get too overwhelmed by the idea of following a
strict-schedule and instead ruin their chances of writing a good paper by
committing to a schedule that does not promote solid research and solid
revisioning. As long as you stick to a strict schedule with self-discipline,
make a good outline, make good claims with good evidence, and give yourself
plenty of time for revisions, writing a paper should be a breeze.

Taking Notes in Class

To clear up any confusion before anyone begins to read this post, I am a Computer Science Major at University of California, San Diego. I run Linux as my primary operating system.

As I go from class to class, I often ponder upon the most efficient and effective way to take notes. Why do I ponder this? Because every time I forget something I wish that I could just use a computer function to scan all of my handwritten notes for certain keywords. But I can’t for several reasons.

  1. My handwritten notes are not on a computer
  2. Manually scanning pages of my handwritten notes into a PDF file would take decades
  3. No computer handwriting recognition system can recognize my handwriting.

Because of these three factors, I often ponder upon taking notes on an electronic device; however, what happens when I want to draw pictures or draw fancy symbols or doodle? I can’t if I am not working on a tablet with a decent stylus – and I’m not. I am working on my trusty laptop. Usually, this is enough to convince me that I should just stick to buying a few nice notebooks and keeping all of my notes organized in them. However, next time I need to find something fast, I regret it, as I really want to CTRL+F my notes.

In order to solve this, I looked for a lightweight note editor program for my laptop that had basic organization and markup capabilities. I found ZIM, which is super handy for building a local version of Wikipedia for all topics that interest you. I used this program for a good 20 weeks. Everything worked great and I acquired a vast amount of notes in many subjects that covered a range of topics. The problem arose; however, when I wanted to use vim keystrokes.

Writing in ZIM is great, don’t get me wrong, but sometimes you just want to be able to write faster. You don’t have time to reach over to the enter key for a newline. You don’t have time to press end to get to the end of the line. You want something faster. In order to solve this, I gave up writing in ZIM’s editor and used vim instead. Of course, I acquainted myself with ZIM’s markup syntax so I could still read my notes from ZIM, but I no longer wanted to use their proprietary environment. Instead, I stuck with my handy-dandy vim.

All was well in my note-taking world. That is, until someone asked for a copy of my notes. They were a mess if you didn’t have ZIM installed. Markup syntax everywhere that made the file almost unreadable to the untrained eye. I needed someway to share this file with my friend while retaining the beauty of its marked up design. The closest markup language I found was Markdown, the internet standard for marking up documents.

I could write all of my notes in markdown and then save them to a GitHub repo and then everyone could access my notes all the time and I could edit them and then push the changes and then everything would be great. In fact, that’s exactly what I did. I setup a repo and began writing my notes in Markdown. The only problem was that I had no way of converting my old notes from ZIM to Markdown. Thus, zimdown was born.

zimdown is my own personal solution to converting ZIM markup files into Markdown. It is not complete, but it will allow me to continue writing my notes in ZIM markup, view them locally in ZIM, and convert them into markdown to push to my GitHub repo for public viewing. Sound like a pain? It probably will be.

Why do I write notes like this? All because I don’t want to let go of my precious vim and I don’t want to use a heavy solution like Evernote. I think it is worth it. What are your thoughts?

A Very Brief Discussion of Literature

During my studies at University of California, San Diego, I have come across a Latin course taught by the wonderful Leslie Edwards. I originally enrolled in the course because I always had an interest in learning where English words were derived from and why they meant what they did. Well, I definitely got more than I bargained for. I discovered a beautiful language.

To say I discovered the language is obviously a lie; however, I discovered something within myself. I was finally able to appreciate the beauty of language. Before I took this course, I never understood why there were ‘Romantic’ languages and why people were so attracted to them. I never understood why people said “The beauty is lost in translation”. Now I know.

The way that Latin sentences and phrases are constructed revolves completely around personal style. The sentences of Catullus, for example, are much different from those of Cicero. Cicero placed verbs and adjectives and nouns in his own unique way and often used the idea of understood verbs and nouns to decrease repetition and increase beauty. As I translated his words, I count feel the knowledge pouring into me. I felt his genius as his thoughts were translated into the modern language of English.

What interests me even more; however, is not the syntax and semantics of the language, but the topics that writers like Catullus and Cicero choose to write about. Often times, their works reflect love, hate, friends, war, and society as a whole. For example, Catullus’ Disillusionment  discusses how Catullus is unsatisfied with the ending of a relationship he had with one of the loves of his life. Seem out of the ordinary? Of course not. Why? This is exactly what people write about today, and this was written nearly 2000 years ago.

I found this to be very interesting. After 2000 years, people are still worrying about the same things. They argue about the same things, debate the same topics, and think about the same things. People who think they are new for writing about a topic “unexplored” should quickly be corrected, as there is a very slim chance that after 2000 years a topic is left unexplored.

This brings me to another point. Often, rap artists and singers of today are praised for writing unique ways of expressing unique topics. Maybe the form of expression (rapping especially, as this is a relatively new form of expression) is different; however, the topics in which they talk about are nothing new. Everything has been talked about previously.

As human society has advanced, it seems, the things we think about have not. We may have new technologies, new ways of life, and even longer lifespans, but the same things still rack our minds with thoughts of joy and hate. Just as Cicero argued the value of friendship in his De Amicitia,  We are often found trying to find the reasons behind the social behavior that we partake in on a daily basis. As time has moved forward, this has not changed whatsoever.

This very topic makes me feel as if studies in fields such as Literature are not worth our time. We could devote our entire lives to the study of poetry or art; however, I am under the impression that nothing new is to be discovered. It has all been done before. This is why most of my time is spent working with new technologies and engineering solutions that I think will put humanity into the future. I am not trying to suggest that Literature does not push us forward, but I do find it interesting that as time has changed, our thoughts and focuses have not.